Verizon Sues The FCC For The Right To Edit Your Internet

8
Posted July 13, 2012 at 2:46 am by Charlie Pryor in The Web
verizon-control-the-web

Who decides what is available on the internet for you to see? Is it the government, like in China, and other tightly controlled countries? Is it corporations, who own rights to high-traffic content and are constantly linking to themselves all over the place (some sites even say another site they own is the ‘source’ of the information, just to make it sound creditable to the reader). Is it you, and the billions of people who use it? Hint: Yes it is, at least for now.

Verizon, however, doesn’t think an open web is a good thing, and they are moving to extreme levels to change history in America, by suing the Federal Communications Commission for the right to censor your content how they see fit.

Verizon customers should be appalled by this move, and I wouldn’t be surprised in the least bit if public uproars occur. Greedy corporations have been trying for years to pass legislation to censor the internet, and if Verizon wins this case, it’ll be the last time the freely accessible web will be ‘freely accessible’ in this country

The move that Verizon is attempting to pull here, in a brief filed as Verizon vs. FCC with the U.S. Court of Appeals, is to gain the right to “pick favorites” and decide what was “priority” for their customers to be exposed to. There are a wide variety of ways you can interpret that, and while Verizon has admittedly ‘never’ used anything similar to this against its customers before, it wants the right to be able to.

The worst part of this, is that when Verizon wins, we all will lose. As soon as one company is allowed to do it, every internet provider will jump on this quickly, and our experiences could be very different depending on whose web we’re using. I use “whose web” on purpose there, because the moment they are actually allowed to filter and modify content based on their own wishes, it no longer belongs to the people (you). They’ll have the right to take away anything, and add new content at their discretion. CNET reports more on the issue:

This comes at the same time that Verizon is set to win approval from the FCC, according to reports, in an airwave buyback deal from a group of cable companies (including Time Warner and Comcast). Only the U.S. Justice Department can block the deal.

Verizon is suing to have the FCC’s net neutrality order thrown out — and it’s not the first time, as Verizon was quick to challenge the FCC about this very issue in 2011 when the FCC first set such rules.

The FCC’s order was intended to keep the Internet as it was when it began — to keep Internet service providers like Verizon from becoming “editors” or gatekeepers. It holds that neither Verizon nor any other Internet provider can block or slow access to online content, including if they disagree with its message or are being paid by a third-party to favor some alternative.

Verizon’s argument is sure to enrage people who cherish the free and open Internet. Verizon’s reason is that Internet/broadband providers inherently have “editorial discretion.”

It doesn’t matter their intentions… if the internet becomes segmented and up for corporate, private control, it will lead to a terrible future on the web. Lets hope sensible people who actually care about our rights do something to stop this from going through. If you have an opinion on the matter, please leave us a comment in the field below.

Here’s a direct excerpt from their filing:

In performing these functions [providing the transmission of speech], broadband providers possess “editorial discretion.”

Just as a newspaper is entitled to decide which content to publish and where, broadband providers may feature some content over others.

Am I off base here? Is this really not that big of a deal after all?


Did you enjoy this article? If so, we’d love to hear your thoughts and opinions in the comments below. It would be great if you came and hung out with thousands of others in HotTips! Community on Facebook. or Follow us on Twitter. We love reading what you have to say!

About the Author

Charlie Pryor

Charlie is a technology nut, and an admirer of quality innovation and design. He holds a Bachelors of Science in Film and Video Production from Grand Valley State University, and is a media consultant and filmmaker. He founded HotTips! back in January 2010, and believes in openness and acceptance in consumer tech.

247086_TV episodes & movies instantly streaming from Netflix. Start your FREE trial!

LEAVE A COMMENT!

7 comments
Matthew Ballew
Matthew Ballew

Down with verizon.

Charlie Pryor
Charlie Pryor

Duane Wills when you're words actually match up to fact, let me know. I'll be right here. Until then, bull shit like "Apple programmed it to say iPhone" will just get you less credibility in conversation.

Charlie Pryor
Charlie Pryor

You're as bad and bias as a politician Duane. Nice use of word-placement to nullify any objectivity you may have had. I especially like the part about "wasting" money on something, and "aggressively" removing something. The best part, is that every word is false, and of the fiction, is all opinionated bullshit from somebody who's never given the product a chance. You speak from having zero to speak from. It's quite genius. Do you pay writers for that stuff, or do you actually come up with it on your own? Siri as it is today was created by Apple. The fact that a third-party service had a name, and used Nuance technology in an app doesn't mean shit. It's integrated, smarter, faster, more reliable, more distinguished, and it's capabilities are greatly enhanced. It's not the same. You could say having the same name means it's the same thing... clearly you'd be wrong, but go with it if you wish. ..... and this article has nothing to do with Siri... WTF are you trying to do?

Matthew Ballew
Matthew Ballew

Sounds like someone is butt Hurt that the android will never be as good as the iPhone lol.

Duane Wills
Duane Wills

Bear in mind, Apple didn't create Siri. Apple acquired Siri. And, once Apple acquired the app, they aggressively removed it from the App Store, deciding that ONLY people who had wasted money upgrading to the 4s deserved to use what was available to everyone all along. In fact, the original developers had intended to launch it on other platforms, too. Nope. Apple wanted to use it as leverage to artificially make the 4s "more" than the "4", so that they could say that the 4s was a worthy upgrade. Siri, itself, uses Nuance technology (which has been used industry-wide for years) for the voice aspect and uses partner companies as a backend for search information and integration with other businesses. tldr; Apple purchased a search company, crippled it to work on only one device, and uses it to prop up a device which the industry considered a marginal upgrade. As far as which applies to Verizon, Verizon is being accused of on-the-fly editing of web content. For a good amount of time, when Siri (on the iPhone) was asked, "What is the best smartphone?", it popped a picture of the Nokia Lumia 900 on the screen, based on user reviews, which put it higher than the iPhone. Not long after, Apple reprogrammed Siri to essentially lie to people and say the iPhone. Now, Siri isn't a portal to the Internet. Siri is a portal to what Apple THINKS you should know, which is a lie, in this case.

Charlie Pryor
Charlie Pryor

Apple owns Siri, created what Siri is, and designed the exclusive device that contains it. They own all servers that the service communicates through, and control the source for the development of it. - Siri is also allowed to search any internet term without hinderance or diversion. Which one of those things applies to Verizon in this case?

Duane Wills
Duane Wills

Apple does the same thing with Siri.

 
From Around The Web
 
  • child abuse ad
  • obama screenshot
  • internet compare thumb
  • stupid-pill
  • DoritosLocos
  • mega upload
  • WalkingDEADS2 on netflix
  • Myspace relaunch